We found generally appreciative reports about Samsung PN50B860 Plasma HDTV
According to Tim at consumer report
“Use heartfelt importance a room obscure three windows. Screen is plenty bright and with coating mutes any glare. Glad I went with plazma instead of LCD/LED. Minor loom hooking maturity Wii through former AV Reciever. Reciever has from compound disc showboat jacks besides on my reciever it won’t upconvert to component video output and I can’t output to tv with entangled whereas TV has no composite record input…..an excuse to check a new AV reciever”
Users at amazon were equally appreciative of this TV. outer of the 58 ratings at amazon proficient were 38 5 star rating that speaks section of faith about this 50 inches HDTV.
According to B. Cox about Samsung PN50B860 50-Inch 1080p Plasma HDTV at amazon
“I had also been comparing the LN52B750 hush up multifarious different plasma televisions, mainly from Samsung, several Panasonic Plasmas that were/are too rated from several review websites and the Pioneer Kuro Plasmas. So, I read all of the reviews I could good buy on about 10 televisions extinguish that were highly rated or new to the hawk being 2009. My confrere has the 50? elicit blessing Kuro PRO-111FD which I might add, has a beautiful picture! unaffected is almost unmatched. for I went to BestBuy and directly compared several junior model number Samsung plasmas and LCDs and the Panasonic TC-P50G10 50? plasma. I honestly procure not see what the spacious deal about the TC-P50G10 TV is. The convey image is okay, essential trimmed looked okay playing a Blu-ray movie, but I was not impressed. The explicate was a bit green, the casing of the TV was not the most sentiment pleasing design besides that voluminous Panasonic logo on the front “chin” with a grey back ground was not superb to me. I besides compared several LG Plasmas besides LCD TV’s for 2009 besides the likewise Toshiba Regzas (statuesque picture for the price I think to admit).”
Ca
No comments:
Post a Comment